Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Frank Miller got me thinking...



Above photo (Left to right): Klaus Janson and Frank Miller at the School of Visual Arts’ “100 Years of Genius: The Life and Legacy of Will Eisner” event in April 2017. Photo by (DC Comics editor and SVA faculty member) Joey Cavalieri.

Frank Miller got me thinking.

On April 4, 2017, during his chat at the School of Visual Arts’ “100 Years of Genius: The Life and Legacy of Will Eisner,” Frank Miller talked a bit on the topic of Will Eisner and comic book Creators’ Rights. Miller explained Will’s views on comic book Creator’s Rights and contracts:

The most frequent business advice [Will Eisner] gave me was: ‘Stop whining.’ Because I would go in saying: ‘Creators’ Rights this, Creators’ Rights that, Creators’ Rights this.’ And he’d say: ‘Look, if you sign the contract, it’s over. Stop complaining about anything.’ His point of view was simply that if you’re working on other people’s material, then you don’t have that much of a claim. And so, clearly, his whole point was that the future of comics was for people to be introducing new material.

(You can watch the entirety of SVA’s “100 Years of Genius: The Life and Legacy of Will Eisner” event here on Youtube.)

In the book EISNER/MILLER, Will stated:

Take a look at the marketplace and understand what its realties are. I never subscribed to this Creators’ Bill of Rights because I believe that there was no reality to it. In the marketplace, moral rights are often disregarded.

And…

Well, there is no ingrained right, there are no God-given rights here. The rights are what you negotiate.

Now, it’s true that Will was a very savvy business person. (And you really have to be if you want to have a successful career in the arts.) I don’t think that Will would have needed to be reminded by something like (the very important) Creators’ Bill of Rights. However, the vast majority of young artists do need to be reminded and told about the Bill and about Creators’ Rights.

(I lecture on all of this in my Sequential Art: Comics Illustration class at SUNY Orange.)

In an interview on the Creators’ Bill of Rights and Creators’ Rights for THE COMICS JOURNAL (No. 137, September 1990) by Gary Groth and with Steve Bissette, Scott McCloud stated:

Whatever crimes are going on at companies where Creators’ Rights are not honored become pretty quickly irrelevant because essentially it’s your own damn fault if you decide to work there… if there is an alternative… yeah, if you went in with some knowledge. ‘What’s smoking?’ As long as the warning is there.

(A must-read and/or must-listen interview with Stephen Bissette and Scott McCloud.)

Over the years, I’ve been quite outspoken about comic book Creator’s Rights.

In 2005, I began becoming more vocal and more public about my views on Creators’ Rights. I started conversations with folks like Steve Bissette, Dave Sim, Rick Veitch, Scott McCloud, and even with Denis Kitchen, Erik Larsen, and Fernando Ruiz.

(All of these discussions are collected and posted at www.yacanteraseink.com)

Dave Sim had suggested to me that my eventual departure from Archie Comics may have been due to my public outspokenness on Creators’ Rights. Dave could very well be right.

In 2010, I officially ended my contributions toward work-made-for-hire.

(Two weeks ago, for about an hour, I was on the phone with a publisher and trying to convince him that I had no interest in working on their work-made-for-hire project.)



Above photo: This photo was taken in June 2014 during the "Creator-owned Comics (vs. Corporate-owned Comics)" panel at the Special Edition: NYC comics convention which was held at the Jacob Javits Center in New York City. I was joined on the panel by Mike Allred and Kurt Busiek.

In 2014, I was on the “Creator-owned Comics (vs. Corporate-owned Comics)” panel held at the Special Edition: NYC comics convention. The panel featured a discussion between myself, Michael Allred, and Kurt Busiek. That panel pretty much summed up my view on Creators’ Rights in regards to Creator-owned Comics versus Corporate-owned Comics.

Simply put: Comic book publishers have a horrible history with treating their writers and artists. If you’re interested in playing in the work-made-for-hire sandbox, then know the environment in which you’re working and know what your rights are. For me, now, creator-owned comics are the only thing that I’ll be doing in comics.

The topic of comic book Creators’ Rights does still interest me a great deal. I still believe that, at the very least, the Creator’s Bill of Rights is a must-read for professional comic book creators and for young artists who wish to have a career in comics and/or in animation.

It’s just that, now, I don’t know if we can actually change the policies of comic book publishers that promote work-made-for-hire. Maybe it’s just best to ignore the likes of Marvel and DC. There are more creator-friendly publishers out there. Why keep flogging a dead horse?

My opinion hasn’t changed, exactly. I like to think that my focus has just evolved. I don’t care what the corporate comic publishers are doing anymore.

I’m wondering if Will Eisner was more often correct about Creators' Rights than I previously thought.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, March 2, 2012

Another letter from Dave Sim...

Today, my mailbox gave me a new package from Dave Sim. Normally, I wouldn’t post a letter such as this. It really has nothing to do with Creator’s Rights. However, the message is a good one, especially when I see all manner of foul language commonly used on the Internet. Anyway, Dave was referring (in part) to Frank Miller’s thoughts on the "Occupy" movement.

Labels: ,

Saturday, February 18, 2012

My 2012 Harvey Awards nomination ballot...



It’s that time of year when comic book creators fill out their Harvey Awards Nomination Ballot. Here’s mine…

HARVEY AWARD VOTING CATEGORIES

BEST WRITER
Robert Kirkman INVINCIBLE
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010
Brian Clevinger ATOMIC ROBO AND THE GHOST OF STATION X
Paul Grist THE WEIRD WORLD OF JACK STAFF
Terry Moore RACHEL RISING

BEST ARTIST
Ryan Ottley INVINCIBLE
Alan Davis CAPTAIN AMERICA
Paul Grist THE WEIRD WORLD OF JACK STAFF
Chris Bachalo AVENGERS #13 and #15
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010

BEST CARTOONIST
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010
Terry Moore RACHEL RISING
Eric Powell THE GOON
Paul Grist THE WEIRD WORLD OF JACK STAFF
Steve Remen HIM

BEST LETTERER
Dave Sim GLAMOURPUSS
Terry Moore RACHEL RISING
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010
Paul Grist THE WEIRD WORLD OF JACK STAFF
Rus Wooton INVINCIBLE

BEST INKER
Mark Farmer CAPTAIN AMERICA
Terry Moore RACHEL RISING
Cliff Rathburn INVINCIBLE
Dexter Vines BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER: SEASON NINE
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010

BEST COLORIST
Fco Plasencia INVINCIBLE
Chris Bachalo AVENGERS #13 and #15
Ferran Daniel AVENGING SPIDER-MAN
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010
Ronda Pattison ATOMIC ROBO AND THE GHOST OF STATION X

BEST COVER ARTIST
Jo Chen BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER: SEASON NINE
Jock DETECTIVE COMICS #880
Eric Powell THE GOON
Alex Ross ASTRO CITY
Adam Hughes BATGIRL

MOST PROMISING NEW TALENT
Ferran Daniel AVENGING SPIDER-MAN

BEST NEW SERIES
ATOMIC ROBO AND THE GHOST OF STATION X Red 5 Comics
BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER: SEASON NINE Dark Horse Comics
RACHEL RISING Abstract Studio
AVENGING SPIDER-MAN Marvel Comics

BEST CONTINUING OR LIMITED SERIES
INVINCIBLE Image Comics
ATOMIC ROBO AND THE GHOST OF STATION X Red 5 Comics
BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER: SEASON NINE Dark Horse Comics
RACHEL RISING Abstract Studio
THE WEIRD WORLD OF JACK STAFF Image Comics

BEST ANTHOLOGY
BACK ISSUE TwoMorrows

BEST GRAPHIC ALBUM – ORIGINAL
HOLY TERROR Legendary

BEST GRAPHIC ALBUM – PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED
ROCKETEER JETPACK TREASURY EDITION #1 IDW

BEST SINGLE ISSUE OR STORY
THE WEIRD WORLD OF JACK STAFF #6 Image Comics
INVINCIBLE ("The Viltrumite War") Image Comics
THE TICK NEW SERIES #8 New England Comics Press
AVENGERS #15 Marvel Comics
ATOMIC ROBO AND THE GHOST OF STATION X Red 5 Comics

BEST DOMESTIC REPRINT PROJECT
ROCKETEER JETPACK TREASURY EDITION #1 IDW

BEST ONLINE COMICS WORK
LETHARGIC LAD http://www.lethargiclad.com/
HIM http://www.himcomic.com/
JONNY CROSSBONES http://www.evilspacerobot.com/
PIPEDREAMS http://scanscorner.blogspot.com/

SPECIAL AWARD FOR HUMOR IN COMICS
Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2010
Steve Remen HIM
Leslie McClaine THE TICK NEW SERIES/JONNNY CROSSBONES
Stephen Scanlon PIPEDREAMS
Eric Powell THE GOON

SPECIAL AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN PRESENTATION
BACK ISSUE TwoMorrows
AVENGING SPIDER-MAN Marvel Comics
ROCKETEER JETPACK TREASURY EDITION #1 IDW
INVINCIBLE Image Comics
RACHEL RISING Abstract Studio

BEST BIOGRAPHICAL, HISTORICAL, OR JOURNALISTIC
PRESENTATION

BACK ISSUE TwoMorrows
HOW TO DRAW WOMEN Abstract Studio

BEST ORIGINAL GRAPHIC PUBLICATION FOR YOUNGER READERS
THE TICK NEW SERIES New England Comics Press



Above: Awesome cover to DETECTIVE COMICS #880 by Jock. ("Jock"? What kinda name is THAT? I think I'm gonna start signing my comics as "Stud.")

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, January 7, 2012

ZOOTANAPUSS #1: The Al Nickerson Edition...



Above: Cover to Dave Sim’s ZOOTANAPUSS #1. TM and © 2012 Dave Sim.

Today, my mailbox gave me a nice surprise, a signed copy of Dave Sim’s ZOOTANAPUSS #1. Dave signed it with "Al Nickerson Edition #1/1." I thought that funny. As it turns out, ZOOTANAPUSS #1 is the incentive variant cover to GLAMOURPUSS #22.



I liked Dave’s mentioning of Will Eisner’s definitions between "graphic narratives" and "graphic novels." I enjoyed the Frank Miller ("For Al Gore and Mother Gaia!")and Todd McFarlane ("Die, Violator Bunny!") parodies. Hee-hee.

Also, as Dave Sim mentioned somewhere else:

We have Glamourpuss 22 coming out and you’ll notice that instead of it being the fourth annual swimsuit issue, it’s not the fourth annual swimsuit issue and that’s because I’ve decided to go off in a completely different direction. I’m doing a Zatanna parody, Zootanapuss.

There’s also a Glamourpuss 22 incentive cover and this is probably very destructive of the comic book field, but we’re all just trying to keep ourselves alive. So, for the Zootanapuss number one cover you gotta buy four of the regular ones to even get the number one cover. Now is that absolutely evil or is that absolutely evil?

Labels: , ,

Friday, August 5, 2011

Creators continue to speak out about Kirby vs. Marvel decision…



Above: Steve Bissette’s Tyrant.

Steve Bissette discusses further the Kirby versus Marvel/Disney verdict in "Honoring A Fallen King, Part 2". In addition, Mr. Bissette writes about Copyright, work-for-hire, Stan Lee, John Byrne, and contracts:

However, some of the worst abuses of creators I have seen in this and other fields are linked to work-for-hire language and contracts (specifically, the worst I have ever seen came out of Archie Comics, Disney, and various gaming companies, none of whom I have personally worked for under such contracts, though I have copies of those contracts in my files).



Above: Dave Sim’s Cerebus.

Also, thanks to Steve Bissette, as he posted a link to Dave Sim’s recent fax concerning Dave’s thoughts on Jack Kirby, Marvel, and work-for-hire.

For more insights to Steve and Dave’s views on comic book Creator's Rights, visit Ya Can't Erase Ink...

And Colleen Doran continues with "MUST READ: Copyhype on the Kirby Case":

Creators, the lesson was hard won by our forefathers. Don’t sign away your precious creations without the full understanding of what you are doing. I’ve signed many work for hire agreements, and have never had cause to regret it, because the work for hire contracts I sign with DC Comics are substantially better than anything creators got 50 years ago.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Kirby vs. Marvel decided...



Above: This Jack Kirby piece was used in "The Art of Mickey Mouse."

Both Bleeding Cool and The Beat are reporting that the court has decided that Jack Kirby’s work for Marvel was work-made-for-hire. Thus, the Kirby estate is entitled to zero money and zero ownership to any characters that Jack Kirby had co-created while at Marvel.

This is no surprise to me. I didn’t think the Kirby estate had any chance of winning this one.

There’s nothing wrong with being compensated for your services. I don’t even have a real problem with work-made-for-hire IF A) you know what you’re getting yourself into, B) you don’t create any characters for someone else, and C) if you're treated fairly.

Hopefully, the Siegel family will clean Warner Bros. clock over Superman.

For more information about comic book Creator's Rights, visit Ya Can't Erase Ink... Here, we feature conversations and interviews with Scott McCloud, Dave Sim, Steve Bissette, Rick Veitch, and others about The Creator’s Bill of Rights and other Creator’s Rights issues.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

My 2010 Harvey Awards nomination ballot...



Well, I just sent in my 2010 Harvey Awards nomination ballot. The Harvey Awards are one of two fancy-schmancy awards given out in the comic book industry which are voted upon by comic book professionals.

If ya work in comics, then fill out a ballot. The deadline is Friday.

I hope this doesn’t seem too tacky, but here’s the list of my nominations:

HARVEY AWARD VOTING CATEGORIES

BEST WRITER
1.Robert Kirkman INVINCIBLE
2.Paul Grist JACK STAFF
3.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD
4.Brian Clevinger ATOMIC ROBO
5.Mike Mignola HELLBOY

BEST ARTIST
1.Ryan Ottly INVINCIBLE
2.Alan Davis DARK REIGN THE LIST: UNCANNY X-MEN
3.Paul Grist JACK STAFF
4.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD
5.Scott Wegener ATOMIC ROBO

BEST CARTOONIST
1.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD
2.Les McClaine LIFE WITH LESLIE
3.Terry Moore ECHO
4.Paul Grist JACK STAFF
5.Stephen Scanlon PIPE DREAMS

BEST LETTERER
1.Dave Sim GlamourPuss
2.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2008
3.Jeff Powell ATOMIC ROBO

BEST INKER
1.Mark Farmer DARK REIGN THE LIST: UNCANNY X-MEN
2.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2008
3.Terry Moore ECHO
4.Andy Owens BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER
5.Cliff Rathburn INVINCIBLE

BEST COLORIST
1.FCO Plascencia INVINCIBLE
2.Paul Mounts POWER GIRL
3.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD 2008

BEST COVER ARTIST
1.Adam Hughes POWER GIRL
2.Amanda Conner POWER GIRL
3.Jo Chen BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER

BEST NEW SERIES
1.THE TICK NEW SERIES New England Comics Press

BEST CONTINUING OR LIMITED SERIES
1.INVINCIBLE Image Comics
2.JACK STAFF Image Comics
3.ATOMIC ROBO Red Five Comics
4.POWER GIRL DC Comics
5.LETHARGIC LAD Lethargic Comics International

BEST SYNDICATED STRIP OR PANEL
1. GET FUZZY

BEST SINGLE ISSUE OR STORY
1.INVINCIBLE #61-65 "Conquest" Image Comics
2.ATOMIC ROBO AND THE SHADOW BEYOND TIME #1-5 Red Five Comics

BEST DOMESTIC REPRINT PROJECT
1.TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES COLLECTED BOOK: VOLUME 1 Mirage Studios

BEST ONLINE COMICS WORK
1.LETHARGIC LAD http://www.lethargiclad.com/
2.LIFE WITH LESLIE http://www.evilspacerobot.com/lifewithleslie/
3.YIRMUMAH http://yirmumah.com/
4.PIPE DREAMS http://scanscorner.blogspot.com/
5.ATOMIC ROBO:"The Yonkers Devil" http://www.nuklearpower.com/2009/09/28/the-yonkers-devil-1-of-7/

SPECIAL AWARD FOR HUMOR IN COMICS
1.Stephen Scanlon PIPE DREAMS
2.Greg Hyland LETHARGIC LAD
3.D.J. Coffman YIRMUMAH
4.Josh Alves THE ADVENTURES OF THE ARAKNID KID #1
5.Benito Cereno/Les McClaine THE TICK NEW SERIES

SPECIAL AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE IN PRESENTATION
1.BACK ISSUE TwoMorrows Publishing
2.LETHARGIC LAD 2008 Lethargic Comics International
3.INVINCIBLE: THE ULTIMATE COLLECTION, VOL. 4 Image Comics

BEST BIOGRAPHICAL, HISTORICAL, OR JOURNALISTIC PRESENTATION (ANY BOOK, MAGAZINE, FILM, OR VIDEO THAT CONTRIBUTES TO THE UNDERSTANDING OF COMICS AS AN ARTFORM)
1.BACK ISSUE TwoMorrows Publishing
2.MODERN MASTERS TwoMorrows Publishing

BEST ORIGINAL GRAPHIC PUBLICATION FOR YOUNGER READERS
1.THE ADVENTURES OF THE ARAKNID KID #1 Crash Land Studio

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 29, 2010

TMNT, Cerebus, and a letter from Dave Sim...



Above: Promotional art for TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES #8 by Kevin Eastman and Peter Laird.

In May of 2008, Peter Laird and Dave Sim came up with an agreement concerning the reprint rights to TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES #8 (July 1986). The comic book featured the guest-appearance of Dave’s Cerebus and team-up with Peter Laird and Kevin Eastman’s Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

In October of 2009, Peter Laird sold the Teenage Mutant Turtles to Viacom for approximately $60 million. I was curious to find out how this deal affected Dave and Peter’s agreement. I wrote Dave. I also e-mailed Peter Laird and Kevin Eastman about this, as well.

I did hear back from Dave Sim. I finally got Dave’s letter in the mail today. Looks like the letter was lost in the postal system for some time. The letter has a cover date of December 23, 2009. Anyway, here’s what Dave Sim has to say about the Viacom sale and it’s affects on TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES #8:

Labels: , ,

Monday, February 22, 2010

A letter from Dave Sim...



Above: CEREBUS artwork by Dave Sim.

In continuing our conversations on comic book Creator’ Rights, I am posting Dave Sim’s latest letter to me. Dave is responding to my blog posts "Comics and Work-Made-for-Hire: Creator’s Rights", "An e-mail from Erik Larsen...", "An e-mail from Fernando Ruiz…", and "An e-mail from Steve Bissette..."

With his letter, Dave had included a copy of Steve Bissette’s "En Route… another true-life tale." Which I won’t be posting here.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

"Comics and Work-Made-for-Hire: Creator’s Rights"



According to the Library of Congress, work-made-for-hire is, in part, described thusly: "Although the general rule is that the person who creates a work is the author of that work, there is an exception to that principle: the copyright law defines a category of works called ‘works made for hire.’ If a work is ‘made for hire,’ the employer, and not the employee, is considered the author. The employer may be a firm, an organization, or an individual."

If done respectfully, I don’t have a real problem with work-made-for-hire in the comic book industry. I don’t have a problem with someone being compensated for employing his or her skills at the request of a publisher. I do have a problem when work-for-hire is used to promote unethical treatment.

I don’t have to tell you about how comic book creators have been abused. I don’t have to tell you about how certain editors or publishers stole or swindled ideas or creations from artists and writers. I don’t have to tell you about the fight for the return of artwork to those who created that artwork. I don’t have to tell you about the right for creators to receive royalties.

However, if you think that these are issues of the past, then I do have to tell you that you’re dead wrong. There are some publishers today that do not return artwork back to all of its creators. There are some that do not offer royalties. There are some that don’t even guarantee creator credits.

Although things have gotten better for comic book creators and freelancers, not all comic book publishers abide by certain ethical practices. We work in an industry that has been appropriately coined by Steve Bissette (for THE COMICS JOURNAL) as "a moral ghetto."

In the world of commercial art, the Graphic Artists Guild has "the Code of Fair Practice." This is a list of ethics promoted by the Graphic Artists Guild.

In comics, we have the Creator’s Bill of Rights. Back in 1988, a group of comic book creators got together to see what they could do about protecting the rights of comic book creators. From these series of summits, specifically at Northampton, Massachusetts, the Creator’s Bill of Rights was produced. The participants of the Bill’s creation included Scott McCloud, Dave Sim, Gerhard, Steve Bissette, Rick Veitch, Larry Marder, Kevin Eastman, Peter Laird, Mark Martin, Steve Murphy, Michael Zulli, Eric Talbot, Ken Mitchroney, Michael Dooney, Steve Lavigne, Craig Farley, Jim Lawson and Ryan Brown. (I’m sorry if I left anyone out.)

The Creator’s Bill of Rights states various rights including "the right to full ownership of what we fully create," "the right to prompt and complete return of our artwork in its original condition," and "the right of approval over the methods by which our creative property is distributed." Some of these rights seem pretty basic, but they are not all honored today.

Sadly, the Creator’s Bill of Rights is largely ignored by many creators and publishers. It’s easy to ignore poor conduct when there is a lack of, or ignorance of, an established list of ethics. It’s even obvious why a comic book publisher would want to ignore the Creator’s Bill of Rights. But, why would a comics creator do so?

My intent here is to make cartoonists, especially young ones, aware of some of the pitfalls in the comics industry. At the very least, the Creator’s Bill of Rights should be looked upon as such. I’m hoping for outspoken discussion and awareness on creator’s rights issues while instilling change in our industry.

Tomorrow, I’ll start posting responses from various comic book creators from the likes of Erik Larsen, Fernando Ruiz, and Steve Bissette.

For more info regarding comic book Creator’s Rights stop by Ya Can’t Erase Ink and the Creator’s Rights forum.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, October 23, 2009

Don't stand in poo!



Above: A Cerebus print by Dave Sim.

Lately, I am (more often than not) reminded of what Dave Sim stated in his Pro/Con address from April 1, 1993:

I can certainly tell you that the happiest days of my life are the days when someone goes "over the wall": The day that Image left Malibu; the day Steve Bissette decided that his royalties from 1963 were going to finance his long-delayed start in self-publishing; the day Colleen Doran decided that her goal was to do A Distant Soil exclusively and that any work she did for any company was just a means to that end. And most particularly the day when Alan Moore said to me, after leaving DC for the last time: "When you find out you've been standing in shit, you don't jump up and down on it to punish it, you walk away."

"That Annoying Pro/Con ’93 Speech" by Dave is a must-read for any cartoonist and for those interested in comic book Creator’s Rights.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Gerhard speaks…



Above: A piece from Gerhard’s "The World without Cerebus."

Gerhard (the fella who illustrated the backgrounds to Dave Sim’s CEREBUS) speaks out about money and leaving Aardvark-Vanaheim.

Gerhard states:

When I left the company, there was enough money there to pay my meager settlement in one lump sum. But I didn't want to put a huge financial burden on Dave and told him he could spread the payments over five years. He agreed. Without reservation. He thought it was a good deal. He told the accountant as much.

Labels: ,

Friday, June 12, 2009

John Byrne vs. Erik Larsen vs. Neil Gaiman vs. Todd McFarlane...



Above: The cover to SPAWN #9 which introduced Angela, Cagliostro, and Medieval Spawn.

Full disclosure: I am a fan of the works of both John Byrne and Erik Larsen. At least twice, I interviewed John for BACK ISSUE. I met Erik twice.

Initially, I wasn’t going to blog again about the whole Neil Gaiman versus Todd McFarlane feud, but things just became very interesting when Erik Larsen started posting on John Byrne’s message board

Erik Larsen: "Neil got a far better deal than he would have elsewhere (as promised) and Neil decided that wasn’t enough and the issue has still not been resolved. The other three writers all took the same deal and were perfectly happy with it. You don’t hear people talking about how Dave Sim was ‘screwed’ because Todd McFarlane ‘only’ paid him $100,000 to write a single comic book… Todd has spent millions defending himself against a guy who, at best, co-created a couple characters."

John Byrne: "Imagine how much he would have had to spend if he weren’t a champion of ‘creator’s rights’!!!"

Mr. Steve Bissette clarifies the whole mess and, also, contributes his own insights on the latest rumblings…

Steve Bissette: "The Kings of their respective and venerable fiefdoms have no idea what it’s like for those less fortunate and well-heeled than they (including those freelancers who make every one of their deadlines without fail), but it’s sure bleakly entertaining to hear them talk it up."

Steve Bissette is correct. The difference between Neil Gaiman and the other creators who wrote for SPAWN is that Gaiman created new characters in his story for SPAWN #9. And, I’m sure that Dave Sim would certainly have a problem if Todd McFarlane started saying he owned a piece of Cerebus because the character appeared in SPAWN #10.

As I’ve said before, I don’t think money is the issue here. Unless agreed upon, being given a very large amount of money doesn’t mean that you automatically loss any ownership of your intellectual property.

I did, finally, read through the thread on John Byrne’s message board. It’s mostly a bunch of nonsense. Erik Larsen is defending his defenseless friend. Byrne is being King of his message board, as usual (which is fine, really). But, the main problem with Byrne and Larsen is that they are the type(s) of comic book professionals who have been treated quite nicely by comic book publishers. Yeah, Larsen left Marvel to work on his own creator-owned comic (which was/is great). Byrne was one of (if not "the") hottest creators in the 1980’s. However, until creators, especially those of privilege (as much as that is), talk amongst each other and band together, I don’t see much more improvement for Creator’s Rights in comics. If the big name creators feel like they are treated well by publishers, they aren’t going to be too concerned about anyone else. There’s not going to be much motivation for them to commit to change.

Anyway, as it stands now, the courts have ruled that both Neil Gaiman and Todd McFarlane share equal ownership to the characters that were first introduced in SPAWN #9 which include Angela, Cagliostro, and Medieval Spawn.

Labels: , , ,

Monday, May 11, 2009

PRINCE OF STORIES...



In the mail today, I received my copy of PRINCE OF STORIES: THE MANY WORLDS OF NEIL GAIMAN. Mr. Steve Bissette had the authors sign the book for me (which was awesome). I also have a nice mention in the book for my very small contribution in helping Steve locate some legal documentation between Neil Gaiman and Todd McFarlane (thanks, Steve).

The chapters of the book describing Gaiman’s feud with McFarlane over the rights to Medieval Spawn, Angela, and Cogliostro, as well as the Marvelman/Miracleman mess is very detailed and quite interesting (and frustrating). Some of us debated all of this over at the Creator’s Rights forum…

"Sim, Larsen, and the Neil Gaiman vs. Todd McFarlane feud"

"Sim on Todd's ‘Man of Miracles’"

Erik Larsen: "The whole Neil Gaiman situation I found to be particularly annoying, mostly because the characters Neil "created" were variations on Spawn himself. A female "angel" instead of a male "devil," medieval versions of existing characters, etc. It bothered me that Todd was stupid enough to let somebody "create" these characters and it bothered me that Neil would insist on owning something that he didn’t legitimately create."

Dave Sim: "The Neil Gaiman situation isn’t as cut-and-dried as you’re making it out to be. Neil knew what he was getting into at DC. Sandman is their character and Neil, as a novice scripter, decided he was going to do some interesting things with it and see what happened. Well, what happened turned out to be huge and, from what I understand, DC did the noblesse oblige "right thing" and magnanimously granted Neil greater—and entirely unprecedented—participation in Sandman and other ‘considerations’ in acknowledgement of what had happened. Whatever he got—and, again, none of us knows because it all took place behind closed doors—all he could do was to count himself lucky because he didn’t have a legal leg to stand on and, presumably, he knew it."

Steve Bissette: "That Todd presumed he could retroactively, claim every conceptual property in the respective issue as his and his alone "boggles my mind," Erik. That you and so many others, including Dave, continue to make insinuations about Neil's character and integrity while defending Todd's "boggles my mind." Neil wasn't short-changed -- the deal, as it was represented to Neil, was broken as soon as characters and concepts Neil introduced in his work for Todd began to surface in other comics and media (of course, once Todd dragged Miracleman into the fray as some aspect of the proposed legal settlement, he only further complicated matters, using a character that was never his, that he never had any claim to or creatively contributed a damned thing to, as a bargaining chip). That was NOT the deal, apparently, was it?"



Above: Todd McFarlane’s "Man of Miracles" statue.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

CEREBUS ARCHIVE #2...



Here’s a nice change of sorts… Dave Sim’s variant cover to CEREBUS ARCHIVE #2 (I swiped the image from Rich Johnston’s "Lying in the Gutters" web-column… just so ya know). In a time when comic book creators and publishers are praising Obama by having him appear on and/or within their comics, it’s pleasing to see an opposing point of view. Remember… Free Speech, tolerance, and all that good stuff. :)

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Mail call...

I received a new letter from Dave Sim today. I had snail-mailed Dave my "Who Really Created Spider-Man?" article. I’m posting Dave’s letter so to share his response and his thoughts on Steve Ditko. I censored the letter to protect the innocent.

Labels: ,

Saturday, January 17, 2009

"Mail Call!" or "Why bother shop at a comic book store when your friends mail you comics?"

Over the past several weeks, I’ve gotten some really great comic book booty in the mail…



Above: Sketch of everyone’s favorite Evil Cyborg Lethargic Lad by famed cartoonist, Greg Hyland.

Greg Hyland mailed me a copy of the most-excellent LETHARGiC LAD 2007. Greg signed the book, and drew a spiffy sketch of Evil Cyborg Lethargic Lad on the cover (see above). I noticed that I was included under the "Special Thanks" listing in the book. I’m not quite sure why Greg would want to thank me, though. Anyway, LETHARGiC LAD 2007 looks really sharp! If you enjoy hilariously fun super-hero comics, then LETHARGiC LAD 2007 is a must-have for you. The book includes all the LETHARGiC LAD webcomics from 2007, and is printed in the widescreen format so that every reader can enjoy each strip in its full artistic glory (what a brilliant idea). To order the limited edition LETHARGiC LAD 2007 and to read new weekly LETHARGiC LAD webcomics, stop by the LETHARGiC LAD website.



Above: Partial cover to Dave Sim’s GLAMOURPUSS #4 (ZOMBIE EDITION).

Also, in the spirit of Christmas, (CEREBUS creator) Dave Sim mailed me a copy of GLAMOURPUSS #4 (ZOMBIE EDITION). Dave signed the book, and even made a Santa Claus hat for the zombie on the cover (see above)… which I thought was very clever. For more on Dave Sim’s GLAMOURPUSS, stop by the GLAMOURPUSS website.

Merry Zombie Christmas, everyone! :)

Labels: , , , ,